Skip to essay

    Wages / Energy / Purchasing power

    Why Are Prices Rising in France?

    Read the receipt, distinguish a rate from a level, and see why an average can miss a household’s squeeze.

    When the average improves, whose budget is actually getting easier?

    The receipt tells two stories.

    INSEE’s final September 2026 release puts consumer prices 3.1% above a year earlier, with energy prices up 21.3%. Yet the overall index fell 0.3% from August: monthly decline and annual increase can coexist.

    The category bars show each category’s own annual rate, not its contribution to total inflation. Households with different spending patterns feel different pressures.

    INSEE ↗

    September 2026 / annual category changes

    +3.1%

    All-items CPI / annual

    Energy21.3%
    Services2.4%
    Food1.4%
    Manufactured goods-0.3%
    Tobacco3.3%

    All-items CPI / monthly: −0.3%

    Read the data table
    CategoryAnnual change %
    Energy21.3
    Services2.4
    Food1.4
    Manufactured goods-0.3
    Tobacco3.3
    Category rates, not percentage-point contributions. Bars encode magnitude; the minus sign identifies a decline.INSEE ↗

    Slower inflation is not cheaper living.

    Inflation is the rate of change in prices. A lower positive rate normally means prices rise more slowly; it does not reverse earlier increases. The chart plots observed annual rates, not a cumulative price-level index.

    CPI and harmonised HICP are separate measures and can differ. The switch deliberately shows them separately rather than combining a monthly observation with an annual forecast.

    INSEE ↗

    2026 / observed annual inflation rates

    0%1%2%3%4%JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep
    Read the data table
    Month 2026CPI annual %HICP annual %
    Jan0.30.4
    Feb0.91.1
    Mar1.72
    Apr2.22.5
    May2.42.8
    Jun1.82
    Jul2.12.4
    Aug2.42.6
    Sep3.13.4

    Price level

    What a basket costs

    ≠

    Inflation rate

    How quickly it changes

    INSEE final September release. This is a rate series, not a cumulative price index. CPI and HICP are distinct measures.INSEE ↗

    Energy travels through the economy.

    Banque de France’s September forecast identifies renewed energy pressures linked to the Middle East conflict, oil and gas prices and refining margins. Higher input costs can pass into transport, agriculture, manufactured goods and services.

    The diagram shows channels, not quantified shares or proof that energy explains every price increase. Contracts, taxes, competition and the timing of wage negotiations help determine how a shock is absorbed.

    Banque de France / ACPR ↗INSEE ↗

    The shock has more than one channel

    Oil / Gas / Refining

    ↓
    TransportAgricultureIndustry
    ↓

    Household prices / Company costs / Wage negotiation

    Conceptual flow. No widths or shapes encode estimated shares.Banque de France / ACPR ↗INSEE ↗

    The wage after prices.

    The September forecast puts average nominal wage growth at 2.0% for 2026 and annual-average HICP inflation at 2.3%. These are forecasts for averages, not September’s observed CPI.

    A simplified real-wage calculation is (1 + nominal growth) / (1 + price growth) − 1. It does not measure a household’s disposable income after taxes, benefits, changing hours or employment. Nor is it the institution’s separate aggregate wage-purchasing-power forecast.

    Banque de France / ACPR ↗

    The wage after prices

    -0.29%Real change for this simplified wage

    (1 + wage growth) ÷ (1 + price growth) − 1

    Illustrative inputs initialized to Banque de France September forecasts for 2026 annual-average nominal wage growth and HICP inflation. Not September observed CPI or household disposable income.Banque de France / ACPR ↗

    Your basket is not the national basket.

    Long commutes and high heating needs give a household different exposure from one that spends more on services. Change the energy and food weights to see how the published category rates interact.

    This is a hypothetical three-category sensitivity exercise. Its weights are not INSEE’s national weights. It cannot reproduce a household’s actual inflation index or model rents, substitution and detailed purchases.

    INSEE ↗

    Your spending changes your exposure

    Services / remainder: 70%

    4.09%Illustrative weighted annual change

    Hypothetical three-category basket, using published annual category rates. Not INSEE weights or an official personal inflation index.INSEE ↗

    From the payslip to the street.

    INSEE’s September outlook expected real wages to stagnate during 2026 and remain below their 2021 level at year-end. It also projected weaker disposable-income purchasing power. These forecasts are different measures from a monthly CPI headline.

    The current mobilization links schools, wages and living costs. An average cannot establish whether a particular family can pay its next bill. Policy responses—wages, benefits, price measures and public investment—have different costs and distributional consequences.

    INSEE ↗Banque de France / ACPR ↗The Journal ↗

    A payslip is not disposable income

    1. 01Nominal wage × hours worked
    2. 02Taxes and contributions
    3. 03Benefits and other income
    4. 04Household-specific expenses
    5. 05What remains affordable
    Different concepts, not interchangeable statistical series.INSEE ↗Banque de France / ACPR ↗

    How to read this essay

    Observed figures, dated reporting and legal texts are sourced. User-input calculators, city schematics and qualitative scenarios are labeled illustrations—not evidence about an individual or predictions. No synthetic data are presented as observed facts. Read the current legal text before relying on a provision.

    Topics & Searches
    • Why Are Prices Rising in France?
    • French politics visual essay
    • French protests
    • Wages / Energy / Purchasing power
    • Amine Zidouh
    Teaching and learning

    Intended audience: Undergraduate students in French studies, history, political science and related fields; independent adult learners.

    Suggested uses: Guided reading, seminar discussion, comparative political analysis and media-literacy activities.

    After using this resource, learners should be able to:

    • Explain the historical and institutional context of the political issue examined.
    • Distinguish sourced facts and official data from interpretation.
    • Analyze how language, images and historical references shape political narratives.
    • Support a comparative argument using evidence from the resource.

    Use the objectives that correspond to the material available on this page. Collection pages provide entry points to individual resources; unfinished or unavailable material is not a completed learning activity.

    Original materials © Dr. Amine Zidouh / French Politics, licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0 unless otherwise indicated. When sharing or reproducing covered material, credit Dr. Amine Zidouh and French Politics, link to the source and license, and identify changes. Images, protest signs, artworks and other third-party materials are excluded. See Rights, Credits & Educational Reuse for scope, attribution and the as-is disclaimer.